Covenants, Part IV - Pursuing Perspective and Precepts
In the previous lesson we examined the question "Is the Constitution Constitutional?"
Pursuing Perspective and Precepts
"The end does not justify the means." Ayn Rand
In all fairness, the Constitution of the United States of
America occupies a unique place in history, although, its basic elements have
been seen in the centralization of governments for thousands of years. The
creation of the institution called the "United States" was a valiant attempt by
men to create a central exercising authority in hopes of bettering the condition
of man without loosing control of that power vested in that government. From the
days of Pharaoh, Saul and Rome such efforts often ended in disaster.
A detailed study, a broader approach and a critical eye upon that history is
highly recommended to understand the context and condition in which that
document rose to prominence and the perils wrought in its consummation.
There are two forces operating in governments.
1. To guarantee the safety of the people there is a granting of
power by the people to government;
2. And there is an imposition of limitations by the people to
guarantee the safety of the people from government.
People are fond of attributing the United States' success, prominence and
power to its constitution. There are many factors that compose our past and
present and the constitution and the institutions it created are only one part
of that equation. Not disregarding the unspoiled natural resources of the land
itself, it is the people that have made this nation great.
In early America there was a higher rate of literacy than in Europe or
Britain, even higher than it is today. You had to know how to read to study the
Bible and it was religious zeal and faith that had been a great motivating
factor in the settling of North America. Education was important, even paramount
but faith in higher principles, precepts and purposes was paramount.
Every home had a collection of books as a prize treasure. Without TV, radio
or other distractions, books and the sharing of them and the ideas they
contained was a common practice. Books like Gibbon's The Rise and Fall of the
Roman Empire had been published. There was a keen interest in governments and
how they worked or did not work. The quest for Civil Freedom was another equable pursuit of those early adventures to America. There were
more law books per capita in America than anywhere else in the world.
It was the inuring conditions of survival and endurance that played a
purifying process for those early Americans. There was no social security, the
people were responsible for their family's needs, protection, education and
condition. The burden of this responsibility cultivated an independent and self
reliant character unprecedented in America ever since. Shouldering that
responsibility is correlative to maintaining the rights so equated with freedom.
There are many people who espouse the Constitution as sacred but do they
really understand it? "Lawyers are being graduated from law school by the
thousands who have little knowledge of the constitution. When organizations seek
a lawyer to instruct them on the Constitution they find it nearly impossible to
secure one competent." 1
As we showed in Part I the People were "not a party" to that
Constitution and the vast majority opposed it.
http://www.hisholychurch.info/study/covenants/ccc1.php
This does not mean they opposed many of the noble concepts contained in it
but that they saw certain dangers in its creation and implementation. Patrick
Henry was one of its most ardent opponents yet he served in an office under its
authority. Most Americans saw great dangers in that structure and form of
government and to know their concerns is to be forewarned and forearmed.
"A constitution is a body of precepts the purpose of which is to
control government action until modified in some authorized manner. These
precepts may be either written or unwritten"2
What was the constitution of those people if they opposed the Constitution of
the United States? What did Samuel Adams mean, on August 1, 1776 when he said,
"Our Union is complete; our constitution composed, established, and approved.
You are now the guardians of your own liberties. We may justly address you, as
the decemviri did the Romans, and say: 'Nothing that we propose can pass into
law without your consent. Be yourself, O Americans, the authors of those laws on
which your happiness depends.'"
We will be looking for the answers to these questions and more in the
articles to come but we shall not limit our search to the brief history of
America but we shall examine the whole history of mankind. To not study and
learn all you can about institutions and enterprises that have such a dynamic
grip and integral influence over our lives and the lives of our children is
foolishness and folly.
Anyone on the net can seek out the Anti-Federalist Papers to see the opposing
views, pitfalls and dangers. Ruination and downfall so common in history might
be more readily avoided with a diligent effort to understand the opposing fears
and trepidation of such a central governing power.
"Those who fail to learn from history
are doomed to
repeat it" Georges Santayana
Our entire concept of history has been greatly influenced through the writing
and rewriting of history in our modern text books.
I highly recommend reading,
"School to
Fool"
http://www.hisholychurch.info/sermon/school.html
And "New Lamps for
Old!"
http://www.hisholychurch.info/sermon/lamps.htm
It is not the constitution which was written as if good men would
take office but the exercise of principles of freedom and God given law upon
which our faith should rest. When the Constitution or any group of men go
contrary to those precepts we should be prepared and remain free enough from
debt and obligation to follow those truths and precepts and not be bound to
follow men who walk contrary to the principles upon which liberty is founded.
Footnotes:
1
The Committee on American Citizenship, ABA , Denver,Co. July
14, 1926.
2
Clark's Summary of American Law.
|